Krusin' the Capitol
By Nebraska State Senator Lowen Kruse
2003 Week 1 January 11, 2003
Yo!
We have returned to the floor. Hopefully bright-eyed. But certainly less
bushy-tailed.
We are required to close a $673 million budget gap for the next two years.
We do not know the real figure yet. It will be less, but still
formidable --
about 11% of total budget.
Elections of chairs this week gave us good leadership. Very close. We
vote
for the persons, not the party, but the 7 new senators do not know the
persons so it gets close.
I do not say it often, so will now. We have a good group of legislators.
A
lot of variety, which represents all kinds of folks, hard working and
fair.
Most are able to listen and dialog. The serious loss in the elections was
Senator Suttle. The one who defeated her is a very good man, who will
bring
his own gifts. Suttle was one of the few who understood health care
delivery, what we must spend, what we do not have to, what is not
efficient,
what savings will cost us more money. Her absence will cost Nebraska $$$,
without doubt.
That is not to praise her. She was just doing her job. But it is a way
to
be specific about how holes in our data bank cost us money. When term
limits
kick in, watch out. We will have lots of holes and it will cost us real
money. It's called "institutional memory."
On the budget cuts, we will be looking at all agencies, after cutting them
three times last year. Finding fat would be fun, but I do not expect to.
Time to sum up the realities of our budget.
I receive messages to get tough. "Cut 10% across the board." That would
be
tough, but also quite stupid. Half of those cuts would simply transfer
expenses to property taxes. That is not cutting. Reality.
So we are left with half the budget. Cut it across the board by 20%.
That
would create chaos, and not allow some agencies to fulfill requirements.
The
treasurer, for example, needs to count all the money, not some of it. The
auditor shortage is already hurting us. Adding one new inexperienced
auditor
will collect $200,000 from tax evasion. Don't hire her? Not smart.
Reality.
One-fourth of the budget is a cost shift when cut. Goes somewhere else,
but
does not go away. More on that, but reality. Another reality is that
prison
costs cannot go down until prison census goes down. Same with State
Patrol
and courts. We are now down to 6% of the budget, which is the total to
run
all elected offices -- governor, att. gen., treas., legislature, 45
agencies,
etc. -- plus all their staffs. Wipe them all out and we are only half way
to
the deficit. Reality.
The item of most concern to me in the above is cost shifts. I have been
consulting with city and county managers as well as providers, to evaluate
the 57 proposals Health and Human Services has passed on to the governor.
DO
UNDERSTAND, they do not recommend all these cuts and the governor has not
said what he is choosing. We have asked every agency to come in with 90%
budget and prioritize the cuts they made to get there. This is their cut
list.
One of these would save the state $3.2 million. We lose 4.5 m in federal
funds if we take the cut. The additional cost to Douglas County would be
about 7 m. Not only a cost shift, but a cost add. [It would cut state
budget.]
Another would shift the cost to hospitals, where room rates would go up
and
private hospital insurance rates would rise. The bills we pay, almost
always
at 40% of cost, would go to hospital emergency rooms, where the law is
that
no one can be turned away. And no 60% federal co-pay.
The law is that the county is "payer of last resort" for health care costs
for low income persons. A hospital or physicians clinic can sue for
unpaid
bills. The county cannot collect the 60% deduction either.
We have squeezed the rates to mental health and nursing homes the last two
years, to the point that some are closing. If we cut the rates for
Medicaid
residents in nursing homes, the private pay rate will have to go up.
Another
way of putting it is that we are ALL being subsidized by the bills paid to
hospitals and nursing homes. Or more precisely, our property taxes are
being
subsidized, because nursing care for low income persons has been a county
responsibility for decades. Why are taxes going up? One big reason is we
are living longer. Over 3/4 of Medicaid is elderly billing.
We are asking state employees to contribute about $1,000 each (salary cut
on
average), for these two years. That is not fair and I do not like it.
They
are not overpaid and they will pay any addtional taxes like anyone else.
However, the positive side is that every one of them will be looking for
ways
on their jobs to save state funds. We need their input and we need your
input if we are not only to survive but to prosper as a state. I am
optimistic in the long haul.
That's the bad news. Next week, the good news. We are on the prowl for
funding sources which can prevent tax shifts.
Hang in there!
Lowen
Back to Top
Krusin the Capitol Index
Home Page
|